PLAZO DE EVALUACIÓN Y ADJUDICACIÓN: 02.11.2023
Dentro de 20 día(s) corrido(s), contados desde la fecha de apertura electrónica de ofertas. Si por causas no imputables a la entidad licitante que serán oportunamente informadas en el sistema www.mercadopublico.cl-, no se puede cumplir con la fecha indicada, se publicará una nueva fecha en dicho portal, la que no podrá exceder de 20 día(s) corrido(s) adicional(es) al plazo ya establecido. KIM · Masnet artificial intelligence
Artificial intelligence, in your working context.
KIM supports your company’s work: analyzing tenders, reading documents and preparing communications. KIM Tenders brings together questions, background and process references. KIM Writing helps draft emails and templates, with a proposal you review before applying.
A real analysis case / 621-907-LR26
KIM helps you identify differences and examine the supporting sources.
This real query shows how KIM relates the terms, process criteria and a regulatory reference to flag a difference that needs review. Open the sources, check which product category each weighting applies to and keep track of what needs clarification before bidding.
- Table in the terms
- 94 points for price
- Process criteria
- 92 points for price
The answer leaves a question to check: whether both weightings apply to the same product category. This case shows how to review that difference and keep its context.
Surfac. Pulmonar Porcino 80 MGML FAM 1000023026 · Query recorded on October 2, 2026, recaptured on October 5 in light and dark themes. Product interface in Spanish.
Check the sources, keep your observations and share the query with your team.
-
Check the background informationFrom the answer to the original document and the process criteria.
KIM brings information from different sources into the answer. Here you can review page 22 of the terms and the criteria published for the process, keeping the difference that needs clarification in view.
References let you check the retrieved information. Document and page are shown where available. The user reviews whether they apply.
Original document · Page 22 of the terms 
Process data · Criteria published for the tender 
-
Note what needs to be resolvedYour observation stays beside the answer that prompted it.
The user adds a note to review amendments and clarifications, confirm the weighting and keep the source that resolves the difference. They can resume their review at that point in the conversation.
This note is personal and private. A written observation is distinct from an assigned task or a participation decision.
Personal note · Review linked to the answer 
-
Keep your explanation in voice and textThe audio and its transcript stay in the context of the note.
Record an explanation when speaking feels more natural. In this example, a 22-second recording keeps what needs reviewing before the bid is finalized. «Ver transcripción» lets you retrieve the text, copy it and check it against the recording.
The transcript lets you review what was said. Creating tasks, approving and recording decisions each have their own actions.
Voice note · Original recording and readable transcript 
-
Share the query your team needs to reviewThe same question and answer, available in the Equipo view.
Publish the query so other people in your company can review the analysis within the same tender. The screenshot shows the query in «Equipo», keeping the question, answer and access to its evidence.
Shared queries and personal notes have different visibility. The note shown in this screenshot belongs to the user who captured it.
Equipo · Shared query and the capturing user’s personal note 
See the references and regulatory source for this answer
The answer brings together a document reference, process data and a regulatory passage. Enlarge the screenshots to examine each source.
Another query: reviewing award dates
One date published. Another written in the terms.
In a recorded query, KIM highlighted a discrepancy. The value lies in returning to the sources and reviewing it.
- Process record
- November 3, 2026
- Literal text in the terms
- 02.11.2023
Query from September 26, 2026 · Suministro Medicamentos Farmacia Popular. Evidence of this answer, not a conclusion for other tenders.
How KIM answers
-
The sources of the process
Terms, annexes, Q&A forum and the official record, or only the document you choose. When the question requires it, also the Public Procurement Law and its regulations, and the reviewed guidelines of CENABAST (the national health supply agency) and ISP (the Public Health Institute).
-
Only valid evidence
KIM looks for the passages that answer and accepts only official or reviewed sources that are in force: an expired or unreviewed guideline is left out.
-
An answer backed by evidence
The returned references and excerpts let you review the support for the answer. Document and page are shown where available.
-
Your check
You open each piece of evidence. Reading the terms and making the decision remain your team’s job.
KIM assistant
3789-38-LP26Suministro Medicamentos Farmacia Popular
Chat
When is the award made and what is the maximum period according to the terms? Say from when it is counted and what effects a delay would have on my bid and the guarantees.
The award is scheduled for November 3, 2026. The terms set a period of 20 calendar days from the electronic opening of bids, extendable by up to 20 additional calendar days if the agency reports the reasons and a new date. The schedule date does not literally match the date written in the terms: there it appears as “02.11.2023”.
The schedule section of the administrative terms counts the period from the electronic opening and allows the additional extension. The clause on changes to the terms provides that, if the award is not made within the period, the reasons and the new date are reported in the system. Decree 661/2024, article 58, also requires reporting those reasons and the new deadline when the period in the terms is not met.
The delay does not appear as an automatic cause for losing your bid or for the performance bond to be called: the terms state that the bid remains valid for at least 60 calendar days from notice of the award, and that the 20 business days to deliver the guarantee also run from that notice. The documents do not specify an automatic effect of the delay that extends those periods beyond what is expressly stated.
The tender record publishes the award for November 3, 2026, while the schedule in the terms literally records “02.11.2023”. The counting and extension rule in the terms is stated.
evidence
Passages and data that support this answer
Cuando la Adjudicación no se realice dentro del plazo señalado en las Bases de licitación, se informará en el Sistema de Información las razones que justifican el incumplimiento del plazo para adjudicar e indicar un nuevo plazo para la adjudicación según el artículo 58 del Decreto N° 661. Cuando la Adjudicación no se realice dentro del plazo señalado en las Bases de licitación, la Entidad deberá informar en el Sistema de Información las razones que justifican el incumplimiento del plazo para adjudicar e indicar un nuevo plazo para la adjudicación, debiendo estar contemplada en las Bases esta posibilidad. Las ofertas tendrán una validez mínima de 60 días corridos, contados desde la notificación de la adjudicación. El incumplimiento por parte del adjudicatario en la no entrega del instrumento de garantía, dentro del plazo de 20 días hábiles contados desde notificada su adjudicación en mercado público, facultará a la Municipalidad para dejar sin efecto la adjudicación de la licitación, pudiendo ser adjudicada al proveedor que le sigue en la respectiva Acta de Evaluación o declararla desierta. Consultation recorded in Spanish. The question and the answer are translated, and the quoted passages remain in their original language.
Apply this approach to one of your company’s tenders.
Start with a specific question, check the supporting information and record what needs to be resolved. The guides explain how to query KIM and keep notes in context.
Three ways to move your analysis forward.
01
Read and summarize lengthy terms
Read the original document in the viewer and consult its summary. Keep the full text at hand to review what matters to your bid.
See usage guides
02
Find requirements and check their source
Review extracted information and its references. The requirements panel covers part of this work. Your team completes the review of the terms.
See usage guides
03
Ask about a tender in context
Ask about deadlines, criteria or guarantees, or apply guided question sets. Conversations stay with the tender so you can resume the analysis.
See usage guides
KIM Writing
From the message you need to write to a draft you review.
Draft a request, correct spelling, summarize content or adjust the tone. KIM proposes subject and text inside the email composer or template editor. You choose what to incorporate.
01
Start with your message
Write what you need to communicate or select an action for the text. This demonstration prepares a request for an internal review.
02
Compare the proposal
Open Changes to identify additions and deletions. You can incorporate the proposal, discard it or request another version.
03
Incorporate what helps
Apply incorporates the text into the draft. Check content, recipients and attachments before deciding to send.
Before reading: find what deserves attention.
Predictivas relates demand, catalog and public history through classification, matches and semantic signals. Rules order the results for review. This discovery complements KIM’s document analysis.
Explore search and prioritizationYou can also keep what you say.
Voice notes and transcription help retrieve ideas and conversations on supported surfaces: notes, chat, Discussion and document comments. Review the text and listen to the original.
Notes, voice and contextWhere does the name KIM come from?
KIM combines KI (the German abbreviation for artificial intelligence, Künstliche Intelligenz) with the M from Masnet.